|
The Land We Need:
With respect to “Small
Pilot NPUK Projects” the land requirements are
rather minimal. A five
acres area for comparative growth rates for an
economical viability study for new forestry crops
will most likely suffice, similarly so for
firewood or
willow
coppicing projects.

Many other
pilot studies like fruit production, bee
keeping, adventure sites, fish farming and the like
can be utilised on plots in the less than 5 acres
region. In addition many of these activities already
have a track record in terms of sustainability and
profitability.
A
slightly larger area, in the region of 10 acres,
could be utilised to combine a coppicing project
with
intercropping. The same size of area could also
be utilised for more complex projects for example starting with firewood
coppicing, offsetting the
carbon footprint of
cremations, and establishing a
funeral pyre site. The planting of further trees
as woodland burial plots could add another
economical leg to the enterprise.
Combining the above mentioned
activities can then take place on land surfaces in
the 10s to 100s of acres region. After all many
modern farmers are using principles of
diversification in order to broaden their secure
economical standing already.
To
sensibly test an integrated
agroforestry scheme one needs about 50 to 100
acres.
At this point the future depends on
available money, land and the types of formerly
native to Britain species one wants to reintroduce.
Any species to be reintroduced must be integrated in
the concept of profitability since this is the only
guarantor for sustainability. As a result the area
of land needed will be guided by the species to be
reintroduced. The
German project area for the reintroduction of a
viable
wisent population is about 10,000 acres, but the
area is 90% forested. For
wild boar a far smaller area would suffice.
Considering the reintroduction of wolves, based on
British climate, one probably needs a minimum of
50,000 acres. An
example supporting such a statement can be found
here under “Wisconsin
Wolf Management Plan” .

Alas a problem
regarding, for example, wolf numbers arises
over time, since even such an area would
possibly not allow for a sufficient gene
pool to be maintained long term due to its
population bottleneck. Even the
application of the
50/500 rule would not suffice since
certain species would never be present in
sufficient numbers to allow their genetic
variability to guarantee long term
viability. Hence to double the surface area
aimed for to 100,000 acres and accept that
from time to time “new blood” needs to be
introduced is advisable.
Success of the
concept and growth of the project area could
then lead to an initially fenced in area
with the future open to options of a network
of Natureparks, managed according to the
Naturepark UK principles, either fenced in
or open with connecting
green corridors.
Whilst we
accept that from the outset it seems
ludicrous to aim for the purchase of such a
large area of land it should still not be
too unrealistic.
Northern England, potentially parts of
Wales or ideally
Scotland would all be possible
locations. One should not restrict the
search for appropriate land to the
Scottish Highlands or other remote rural
locations since industrial
wasteland or ex
open cast mining areas lend themselves
as well.
A private
company in
South Africa bought thousands of
acres of farm land near
Cape Town to develop partially as a
residential area game park in commutable
distance to the
city,
Gondwana Game Reserve, and the plots are
selling fast. Similarly the
Shamwari Game Reserve was established on
overgrazed former farm land, now
profitably marketing itself as a “big
five” game park as well as offering
conference and other facilities.
Other possibilities rest
around coordinating Naturepark UK’s efforts
with organisations which already hold
sufficient lands, like the
National Trust
,
the National Trust for Scotland
, the
Woodland Trust,
the
Forestry Commission or
private land owners.
Lease or
purchase agreements as well as
coordinated efforts might form valid options
in future. |