|
After the last
ice age
central Europe needed to develop over thousands
of years from open grassland to forests. Planting
would have resulted in quicker
reforestation but humans at the time were hardly
in a position to do so. Nevertheless man was the key
player in reducing the endless
forests
over a relatively short
period of time, mainly from the
medieval times onwards.
With the human world population expected to reach
9 billion by 2040 mounting pressures on natural
resources are to be expected. The question might
arise to decide between a managed
woodland or no woodland at all since a “not
profitable”
ancient woodland
is likely to fall prey to a profitable conversion
into arable land for field crops.
Our Responsibilities towards the Developing World:
Another firm argument for a project
like Naturepark UK rests with the relationship the
United Kingdom, as a
developed,
industrialized country, has with the
developing world. After all we eradicated many
of our naturally occurring wildlife, especially the
larger
predators (like wolves, bears, lynx,
etc.) and
herbivores (like wisent and elk) a long time
ago, yet we expect developing countries to preserve
their wildlife and conserve their environmental
heritage. We watch with shock and horror reports
about deforestation, with images of barren hill tops
and soil erosion, in the developing world. But on
our doorstep we declare the same type of destroyed
areas as
national parks, keep them locked in an
environmentally impoverished state by ongoing
overgrazing, and resist suggestions of
re-forestation in order to preserve our "natural"
heritage.
Cumbria, the Yorkshire
Dales and
Moors, the
Scottish Highlands, etc.; they all used to be
covered in woodland.
The
human population explosion, mainly happening in
the developing world, and
overpopulation of planet earth are realistic
threats, but we still have to acknowledge that most
developing countries are just catching up with the
developed world in respect of population density and
standard of living.
Is it not an act of
hypocrisy to expect others to do what we failed
to do whilst simultaneously not showing any
willingness to lead by example?
Success of Naturepark UK would not
only enrich our homeland with
natural diversity, it would also give a complete
example to others that the conservation of nature
and furtherance of species diversity is not only
possible but also profitable - the concept could
even be exported as a
package deal world wide. Thus the
credibility of all our conservation efforts in
the developing world would inevitably increase and
developing countries might find a model to escape
some of the mistakes the developed world encountered
during their own journey through history.
Please remember: A concept of allowing for faster
than natural change of the environment in order to
utilise profits by which nature pays for its keep,
monitored for
sustainability by a not for profit organisation,
forms a novel approach to allow for a diverse,
profitable and sustainable use of natural resources.
This concept would render the project in its
entirety crises resistant since different economical
legs would provide overall project safety even in
times of
economic downturn and hardship.
If you feel that this project is
worth supporting then please tell all your friends
and family about it. Forward the
Naturepark UK website details to them and ask
them to make this site their Amazon purchase home
page in order to give their support. |